How about it?
At least a dozen former members of domestic terrorist organizations are college professors, a guest blog on The Other McCain reports.
This is what I expect from Islam. When will America wake up?
You want my answer?
When Muslims kill a sufficient number of Americans. Only then will the leftist media be forced to confront the reality that Islam calls for the subjugation or death of infidels.
The families of Navy SEALs killed in an August 2011 shoot-down of a helicopter in Afghanistan spoke at a press conference Thursday morning, citing a number of grievances, including an allegation that the Pentagon invited a Muslim cleric who “disparaged in Arabic the memory of these servicemen.”In addition to blasting the Obama administration for the mission and for an official investigation they deemed a cover-up, the families complained that “military brass, while prohibiting any mention of a Judeo-Christian God, invited a Muslim cleric to the funeral for the fallen Navy SEAL Team VI heroes who disparaged in Arabic the memory of these servicemen by damning them as infidels to Allah.”
Ah, the Religion of Peace! As Barry said, “one of the world’s great religions.”
A mass exodus of Christians is currently underway. Millions of Christians are being displaced from one end of the Islamic world to the other.
We are reliving the true history of how the Islamic world, much of which prior to the Islamic conquests was almost entirely Christian, came into being.
The U.S. Commission on International Religious Freedomrecently said: “The flight of Christians out of the region is unprecedented and it’s increasing year by year.” In our lifetime alone “Christians might disappear altogether from Iraq, Afghanistan, and Egypt.”
Ongoing reports from the Islamic world certainly support this conclusion: Iraq was the earliest indicator of the fate awaiting Christians once Islamic forces are liberated from the grip of dictators.
The 2010 Baghdad church attack, which saw nearly 60 Christian worshippers slaughtered, is the tip of a decade-long iceberg.
In 2003, Iraq’s Christian population was at least one million. Today fewer than 400,000 remain—the result of an anti-Christian campaign that began with the U.S. occupation of Iraq, when countless Christian churches were bombed and countless Christians killed, including by crucifixion and beheading.
It matters not to Democrats. Getting votes is all that matters. Destruction of the USA? Hell, they don’t like America anyhow.
The Heritage Foundation said Monday that legalizing illegal immigrants would cost taxpayers a net $6.3 trillion over the next 50 years — releasing a report that ignited a venomous battle over an immigration bill and who is truly representing the conservative movement in the debate.
Driving the costs in the Heritage report are simple demographics: Illegal immigrants are more likely to lack a high school education, and more than a third of households headed by illegal immigrants live below the poverty line, meaning those households consume more in services than they pay in taxes.
Thanks to http://www.restoreamericanliberty.com for putting me on to this video.
So Barry and his Media want us the believe law enforcement wants the public disarmed of “assault” weapons and “high-cap magazines.”
Here is a “REAL” survey of law enforcement. The first point (just to entice you to read the rest):
1.) Virtually all respondents (95 percent) say that a federal ban on manufacture and sale of ammunition magazines that hold more than 10 rounds would not reduce violent crime.
Sweet. The latest review on Amazon is 5 Star!
Mr. Reddy weaves a compelling tale! It almost seems as if some of his scenarios are already in play! An extremely good book, I highly recommend it!!!
Ah, the anti-American United Nations. The idiots would have us disarm:
UNITED NATIONS — Killer robots that can attack targets without any human input “should not have the power of life and death over human beings,” a new draft U.N. report says…
Report author Christof Heyns, a South African professor of human rights law, calls for a worldwide moratorium on the “testing, production, assembly, transfer, acquisition, deployment and use” of killer robots until an international conference can develop rules for their use…
His report cites these examples, among others, of fully or semi-autonomous weapons that have been developed:
– The U.S. Phalanx system for Aegis-class cruisers, which automatically detects, tracks and engages anti-air warfare threats such as anti-ship missiles and aircraft.
Oh, I get it. What garbage. All it will take is for someone to complain that so-and-so was pushing his views and wham, down will come the anti-Christian brass…
We are losing our country to leftists who hate God (but love Islam).
WASHINGTON — It’s OK to evangelize. But it’s not OK to proselytize.
That’s what the Pentagon said Thursday, attempting to clarify its position on religious speech in uniform as controversy swirled up around press reports over possible prosecutions of troops for sharing their faith.
What it comes down to, officials said, is that discussing matters of faith and religious practice with a willing audience is allowed, but pushing religious beliefs on those who don’t want to hear it is a form of harassment forbidden under Defense Department policies.
This ought not surprise anyone paying attention…
The one thing made incredibly apparent from this fraud and our inability to get any traction with it is this: Leftist now totally dominate America…
Not that we are surprised, but now there are multiple copies of Barack Hussein Obama’s “real” birth certificate that are surfacing and they are clearly indicating fraud.
Says Steven Emerson, who runs the Investigative Project on Terrorism:
“Numerous experts on Islamic terrorism like myself … were banned from speaking to any U.S. government counterterrorism conferences,” Mr. Emerson told The Washington Times. “Instead, these agencies were ordered to invite Muslim Brotherhood front groups.”
How’s that Hope and Change working for us?
Read carefully, Obama (through Holder) only said he would not target a non-combatant… leaving the door wide open for Barry to kill Americans he deems combatants…
I hate it when a normally intelligent operation like the Washington Times blows it thusly:
It took a 13-hour filibuster last month for Sen. Rand Paul to extract a reluctant acknowledgment from the Justice Department that the president may not target U.S. citizens on U.S. soil.
And, on the other hand, a concise analysis of Obama’s plans…
How can anyone argue with this sage advice?
He says the NRA is putting out misinformation. Really? This statement quoted below is an absolute lie. This guy is a lying sack of you know what. I’ve read the proposed legislation and have posted about it.
There is NO WAY all it does it what he says below:
Mr. Manchin plans to “go to every gun show” he can to convince doubters of the bill’s merit.
“All I’m trying to do is keep a crazy person who’s been found mentally incompetent through a court and to keep a person whose already been convicted of a crime from buying a gun at gun show or online,” he said. “That’s all.”
Don’t EVER tell Dave Kopel his legal analysis is all wet…
Today, the U.S. Senate will vote on the Manchin-Toomey amendment to Senator Reid’s gun-control package. In a Monday post on the Volokh Comspiracy, I criticized the amendment because two of the important pro-gun-rights provisions in the amendment were misdrafted, and had the opposite effect of what was claimed.
The amendment was drafted with input from Alan Gottlieb’s Citizens Committee for the Right to Keep and Bear Arms, an excellent organization that has done great work on behalf of the Second Amendment for the last four decades. I believe that CCRKBA’s motive in assisting Senator Toomey in his negotiations with Senator Schumer were honorable, but I also believe that the deal struck was not nearly as good for Second Amendment rights as Alan Gottlieb has claimed.
On Tuesday, Gottlieb sent out an email headlined “David Kopel’s Claims Regarding the Manchin-Toomey Amendment are False.”
Below, I’ll respond to each of Alan’s arguments. The arguments are footnoted; for ease of display, I pasted the footnotes at the end of each section to which they pertain.
Excellent words from Dave Kopel:
Senators vote on actual bills, not poll questions. Yesterday, they never had a chance to vote on a pure bill about background checks.
The base bill on the Senate floor used model language from Mayor Michael Bloomberg of New York. Besides gun sales, it also applied to temporary and innocent transfers — like letting your spouse borrow your gun for a few hours to take it to the target range. The expansive language would have felonized almost every American gun owner — and that’s not a concept that has 90 percent support.
Although a gun control measure may garner wide approval, a very large fraction of the public that favors the measure does not expect it to reduce crime.
The Manchin-Toomey substitute avoided the temporary transfer problem. But it was hastily drafted in secret, and seriously miswritten. For example, the language, which claimed to outlaw federal gun registration, would actually have legalized one form of registration that is currently banned: building a registry from the sales records that firearms dealers are required to send to the government when they retire from business.
Although President Obama is personally popular, his emotional bullying about Newtown had little effect, since everyone could see that neither the Schumer legislation nor the Manchin-Toomey bill would have made any difference there; the killer’s mother acquired her guns in a state that already had very strict gun laws, and she recklessly left them available to her son, despite his obvious mental illness. Background checks were irrelevant.
For decades, pollsters have observed that although a given gun control measure may garner wide approval, a very large fraction of the public that favors the measure does not expect it to reduce crime. They approve the control with an apathetic “Why not?” Support for gun control is often broad but shallow.
President Obama’s post-election embrace of gun control and of Mayor Bloomberg drove National Rifle Association membership from four million to five million in a few months. The N.R.A. is not the most powerful lobby on Capitol Hill because Wayne LaPierre is the most charming man in town. The N.R.A. wins Congressional votes because it represents millions of Americans who have repeatedly shown that they heed the words of the late Charlton Heston, to “vote freedom first.”